Serokell’s Work on GHC: Dependent Types, Part 5

> -- Expressions > t1 = Typed Int 42 > t2 = Typed String “hello” > t3 = Typed (Int → Bool) even I’m so used to putting the type following the expr, this still doesn’t feel right (even though I knew it was coming). Is it really not possible to support t1’ = Typed 42 (type Int) Typed :: forall a. a → (type a) → T a