{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreidglrbnih6yes37mmzz7hgcaxwxduqq2wbvgfhixczifi6g4jy2iu",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:pi6woz4d47bkuws673w2il2r/app.bsky.feed.post/3mnhj2yqxqyy2"
  },
  "path": "/t/serokell-s-work-on-ghc-dependent-types-part-5/14184#post_7",
  "publishedAt": "2026-06-04T09:43:07.000Z",
  "site": "https://discourse.haskell.org",
  "textContent": "> -- Expressions\n>  t1 = Typed Int 42\n>  t2 = Typed String “hello”\n>  t3 = Typed (Int → Bool) even\n\nI’m so used to putting the type following the expr, this still doesn’t feel right (even though I knew it was coming). Is it really not possible to support\n\n\n    t1’ = Typed 42 (type Int)\n\n      Typed :: forall a. a → (type a) → T a\n\n\n",
  "title": "Serokell’s Work on GHC: Dependent Types, Part 5"
}