I was raised Muslim. Here's why I respect Denmark's right to ban the call to prayer

The Danish government is considering whether to restrict or ban the public broadcasting of the Islamic call to prayer.

Critics have condemned the proposal as discriminatory and incompatible with religious freedom.

As a non-practising Muslim, I see it differently.

The Islamic call to prayer holds deep religious significance for many Muslims.

TRENDING

Stories

Videos

Your Say

Respecting that fact, however, does not require every country to incorporate it into public life.

Denmark is not a Muslim country. It is a democratic nation with its own history, traditions and cultural identity.

Like any sovereign state, it has the right to decide how religion is expressed in public spaces and which customs become part of its public culture.

Western societies have shown remarkable openness towards religious diversity.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

• I asked Trump about our next PM. His answer is worse than GB News viewers might think – Bev Turner
• The King of the North has a lot to say, but now the real Andy Burnham to stand up - Paul Embery
• Trump's Iran deal isn't a surrender. It proves America is finally getting smart in the Middle East – Dr Azeem Ibrahim

Across Europe, Muslims are free to build mosques, pray openly, observe Ramadan, wear religious clothing and raise their children according to their faith.

Those freedoms are fundamental and should remain protected.

Public broadcasting is different. Every society sets boundaries around what is amplified in shared spaces.

Deciding where those boundaries lie is a matter for democratic debate, not a sign of intolerance.

There is also an inconsistency in how these discussions are often framed.

In a number of Muslim-majority countries, public expressions of other faiths face restrictions, and church bells are either limited or absent altogether.

Few people expect those countries to abandon their religious or cultural norms.

Yet, when a European nation seeks to preserve its own traditions and character, it is frequently accused of discrimination.

Countries should be welcoming to newcomers, but integration cannot be a one-way process.

People who settle in a country inevitably adapt to aspects of the society they have chosen to join. That is not oppression. It is how successful, cohesive societies function.

None of this prevents Muslims from practising Islam. Mosques will remain open. Prayers will continue. Religious freedom will endure. What is being debated is whether a particular religious practice should be broadcast into the public square.As a non-practising Muslim, I have no difficulty respecting Islam while also believing that Denmark has the right to make this decision for itself.

Our Standards: The GB News Editorial Charter