General Discussion • Re: Pale Moon's PR Problem

Someone opens up Pale Moon for the first time, they see an ancient UI;

I beg to differ. This is a really poor characterization. Unless of course, you characterize an integrated-with-the-OS UI as "ancient", and therefore any native desktop UI the same.

They then conclude that it is an old, 'legacy' browser.

So why were they interested in Pale Moon, to begin with, if they don't even give it a chance? I think if someone finds Pale Moon interesting enough to try, they would be a bit more interested in it than giving it a 30 second "let's go to YouTube" run. And if not, then they really just wanted Chrome with a different dress.