{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreid2tzd3rkuiwsjf4ttkrhw2gnpu7wxeza5q3z55ajfxjoaovrzs2y",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:hqad6xwuzg7oqfmwylfkvqfm/app.bsky.feed.post/3mmmm6t72oo52"
  },
  "path": "/viewtopic.php?t=33466&p=274620#p274620",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-24T18:28:08.000Z",
  "site": "http://forum.palemoon.org",
  "textContent": "> Someone opens up Pale Moon for the first time, they see an ancient UI;\n\nI beg to differ. This is a really poor characterization. Unless of course, you characterize an integrated-with-the-OS UI as \"ancient\", and therefore any native desktop UI the same.\n\n\n> They then conclude that it is an old, 'legacy' browser.\n\nSo why were they interested in Pale Moon, to begin with, if they don't even give it a chance? I think if someone finds Pale Moon interesting enough to try, they would be a bit more interested in it than giving it a 30 second \"let's go to YouTube\" run. And if not, then they really just wanted Chrome with a different dress.\n\n* * *",
  "title": "General Discussion • Re: Pale Moon's PR Problem",
  "updatedAt": "2026-05-24T18:28:08.000Z"
}