{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreihrntiwqiz4ivvgb7sobrugv3m6tccyjcda755s2mmkxhmusq5nuu",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:zcsop6sjapkb5vlahd24pddv/app.bsky.feed.post/3mmcv2adg3cy2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreihzevq7vvvby4mtim3vtzkdvoi4f6dpq377dkwfwq2ktp5wyruoea"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 387475
  },
  "path": "/voices/thought-leaders/opinion-supreme-court-speaks-in-fragments-while-history-demands-clarity/",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-20T11:00:00.000Z",
  "site": "https://www.rappler.com",
  "tags": [
    "Editors' Pick",
    "Thought Leaders",
    "Bato dela Rosa",
    "International Criminal Court",
    "Supreme Court of the Philippines",
    "war on drugs"
  ],
  "textContent": "The longer the Court refuses to speak with clarity, the more it creates the impression that it is waiting not for legal illumination, but for political weather conditions to stabilize",
  "title": "[OPINION] A Supreme Court that speaks in fragments while history demands clarity"
}