{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreif5nji5azco7cu45hyxrnusa2a5mgqqj6xkgbskgvx7rnqsnhezly",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:zbfb6i3avrqaihcla4pvbtl5/app.bsky.feed.post/3meks7m6r37v2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreie5wssasjt6ovmg3mrzegzaf47vctsnlstyfpqq26k4eajbbibh3e"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/webp",
    "size": 319324
  },
  "path": "/module/newswire/ext_link.php?rid=361984",
  "publishedAt": "2026-02-11T05:51:39.000Z",
  "site": "https://lxer.com",
  "textContent": "With recently having carried out benchmarks and finding the Intel Xeon 6780E \"Sierra Forest\" performance has improved ~14% since launch day thanks to open-source/Linux software improvements plus also recently having carried out Xeon 6980P Granite Rapids vs. EPYC 9755 128-core benchmarks using the latest upstream software, here is a look at how the Xeon 6780E \"Sierra Forest\" dual socket server is comparing up against the AMD EPYC 9965 Turin Dense flagship when both are running up-to-date software.",
  "title": "Intel Xeon 6780E Sierra Forest vs. AMD EPYC 9965 On Linux 6.18 Performance"
}