Some questions about LLMs

Some obvious giveaways of LLM usage outside using review tools:

• verbose commit messages like feat(ui): refine flyout UI - consistent border-radius, no menu bar gap, fix macOS activation on hide or expand task file cleanup for generated sidecars and update task name/path normalization mixed with simple “Bump version”
• the fact that since April your repository has gained ~80000 lines of Rust, including from-scratch implementation of BitTorrent stack, or both Gnutella and ADC protocol having been merged on the single day
• em-dashes in code comments; comments on internal functions no one would bother documenting
• zero TODO or FIXME comments whatsoever

Your mention of the thread asking for clarification what is slop is at very best misleading, because over there, it’s explained that there’s no reason to hide commit history full of mistakes and fixes, and your app is not that, even if you are proud about it.

Strict anti-LLM wording is there exactly to prevent this sort of lawyering you are attempting here.