{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreifmdjwu7d2smkay2iong7aczhmtva6gdhnqtu3ewwcbw3fgewqf5i",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:xqfdcejkrxgzzzg23zc63rux/app.bsky.feed.post/3mncqufkay4h2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreibmddcrytxzbzmfneostp7ddu2yprgtwdg6jhv4cwiludaeajsr7u"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 86381
  },
  "path": "/blog/2026/06/02/a-standard-in-name-only/",
  "publishedAt": "2026-06-02T09:19:09.000Z",
  "site": "https://blog.documentfoundation.org",
  "tags": [
    "LibreOffice",
    "Open Document Format"
  ],
  "textContent": "When a public administration is told its documents are stored in “an ISO standard format,” the assumption is reasonable: an ISO standard ought to be a clean, implementable specification that any qualified software vendor can support. Standards exist precisely so that nobody is locked to a single supplier. OOXML —",
  "title": "A Standard in Name Only: What OOXML Transitional Tells Us About Format Sovereignty"
}