{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreigej7bjvqmz44v2bdmlscw6uof55qnvr6jkonmcfp7scnxiqdx5xu",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:xlhdb7otmtzrspsbaq7wzbac/app.bsky.feed.post/3mmu3xzwsfsw2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreieixezjfirwqwjbhmpv77kzrffq3ve2ide7w5j3tbwuhd4o34wszq"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/png",
    "size": 634071
  },
  "description": "They passed the laws. They bought the houses. Our people paid the rent, paid the tax, paid the trauma — and this white supremacist neoliberal government called it \"fairness.\" This is not policy. This is organised theft by the comfortable, from the vulnerable, at scale.",
  "path": "/the-landlord-parliament-how-aotearoas-ruling-class-voted-itself-rich-while-whanau-slept-in-cars-28-may-2026/",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-27T18:07:14.000Z",
  "site": "https://www.themaorigreenlantern.maori.nz",
  "tags": [
    "The Comfortable Thief",
    "“THE COMFORTABLE THIEF” - 28 May 2026How Louise Upston Robs Whānau Blind with a Smile, a Mortgage-Free Apartment, and $52,000 of Your Money — While She Cuts the Floor from Under the PoorThe Māori Green LanternIvor Jones The Māori Green Lantern",
    "Government MPs acquired 25 extra investment properties after passing pro-landlord reformsA New Zealand site covering pop culture, politics and social life through features, criticism, interviews, videos and podcasts.The SpinoffJoel MacManus",
    "The Spinoff",
    "ANZ",
    "Davenports Law",
    "The Conversation",
    "Deloitte",
    "Elite Plunder Masquerading as Policy: How Luxon's Austerity Fuels Intergenerational Poverty",
    "Scoop",
    "NZ Herald",
    "reported by ODT",
    "Stats NZ's Housing in Aotearoa 2025 report",
    "full 2025 housing data",
    "Salvation Army's rental affordability report",
    "Māori Party stated in 2024",
    "The Salvation Army",
    "rental affordability report",
    "Te Ao Māori News in March 2026",
    "the Salvation Army",
    "World Socialist Web Site's January 2026 analysis",
    "Waatea News",
    "They Don't Want to Fix Homelessness. They Want to Hide It from View",
    "The Motel Generation and the Man Who Calls It \"Success\"",
    "Māori Housing tag",
    "Housing Is a Right, Not a Privilege",
    "Unmasking the Neoliberal Assault on Tenants' Rights",
    "Te Pā Harakeke o te Pākehā",
    "Stats NZ",
    "Te Ao Māori News",
    "Elite Plunder Masquerading as Policy",
    "app.koha.kiwi/events/the-maori-green-lantern-fighting-misinformation-and-disinformation-ivor-jones",
    "themaorigreenlantern.maori.nz/#/portal/support",
    "facebook.com/Themaorigreenlantern/subscribe"
  ],
  "textContent": "**Mōren** a ano Aotearoa,\n\nThis essay examines the property acquisitions of coalition MPs and the pro-landlord laws they passed, because these decisions directly affect Māori whānau, democratic accountability, and the public's right to know when lawmakers profit from the rules they write. It reads alongside The Comfortable Thief, published 28 May 2026 on The Māori Green Lantern, which names the same system from a different angle — the welfare sanctions regime, the retrospective debt legislation, and the minister who collects $1,000 a week from the public purse while denying others $100.\n\n* * *\n\n## The house with a trapdoor\n\nI want the western mind to picture a banquet hall. At the top table sit the ministers, the party caucuses, the landlords in suits, the smiling defenders of \"market confidence.\" Beneath that table is a trapdoor. Every time they pass another landlord-friendly law, another whānau drops through it. The people above call that efficiency. The people below call it homelessness.\n\nThe Comfortable Thief does not announce himself. He does not break your window. He changes the law so the window belongs to him. He sits across the debating chamber, drafts the legislation in your name, pockets the dividend, and then tells the media the market is working.\n\nThat is the figure at the centre of The Comfortable Thief, published today — and it is the same figure who appears, by name, in Parliament's register of pecuniary interests.\n\n“THE COMFORTABLE THIEF” - 28 May 2026How Louise Upston Robs Whānau Blind with a Smile, a Mortgage-Free Apartment, and $52,000 of Your Money — While She Cuts the Floor from Under the PoorThe Māori Green LanternIvor Jones The Māori Green LanternGovernment MPs acquired 25 extra investment properties after passing pro-landlord reformsA New Zealand site covering pop culture, politics and social life through features, criticism, interviews, videos and podcasts.The SpinoffJoel MacManus\n\nAs revealed by The Spinoff, MPs from National, ACT and New Zealand First acquired at least 25 additional rental, investment or second-home properties after this government changed tax and tenancy settings in favour of landlords. As explained by ANZ and Davenports Law, those changes included restoring mortgage interest deductibility and cutting the bright-line test back to two years. As discussed by The Conversation, this same package also restored the power of landlords to end tenancies without cause.\n\n## The Deep Dive Podcast\n\nNew Zealand MPs Profit From Landlord Laws\n\n0:00\n\n/1098.977234\n\n1×\n\n> Listen to a lively conversation between two hosts, unpacking and connecting topics in the sources of this essay. I apologise in advance for the AI's very harsh pronounciation of reo. Please dont shoot me, :).\n\nThis is not an accident. This is not a misunderstanding. This is not the market floating free like some neutral weather event. This is a political design. They loosened the rules for property investors, then a cluster of government MPs increased their own exposure to the very market they had just made more profitable. That is why I write this. That is why I name names.\n\n* * *\n\n## What they changed — and who it helped\n\nThe coalition restored full interest deductibility for residential investment properties in two stages: 80% deductibility from 1 April 2024 and 100% from 1 April 2025, as set out by ANZ and reinforced by Deloitte.\n\n> That is not a technical footnote. It is a tax gift to landlords with debt, directly improving the cash flow of people already holding appreciating assets.\n\nThe government also reduced the bright-line period to two years from 1 July 2024, replacing the previous five- and ten-year settings, as summarised by ANZ, Deloitte and Davenports Law.\n\n> It became easier to speculate, flip and profit with less tax friction. When a state is already failing to house its people, removing barriers to speculative gain is not neutral policy. It is a declaration of allegiance.\n\nAt the same time, the government restored no-cause termination powers for landlords, weakening tenure security for renters, as outlined by The Conversation. A family can be paying rent on time, keeping the place clean, sending the tamariki to the local kura\n\n— and the landlord can still decide they want them gone. No reason required. No appeal.\n\n> Just: _go_. The law leans harder toward property and further away from people. That is the ideological fingerprint of this government in a single sentence.\n\nThen came the register.\n\nAs reported by The Spinoff, ACT MP Parmjeet Parmar added five new rental homes this term — eight investment properties in total — while National MP Kate Nimon added three new rentals in Napier and Hastings.\n\n> The same investigation identified Erica Stanford, Simon Watts, Tom Rutherford, Joseph Mooney, Shane Reti, David MacLeod and Grant McCallum as having added residential properties, along with several MPs who purchased Wellington properties while eligible for taxpayer-funded accommodation support.\n\nThis is the part where the defenders of power mutter about coincidence, family decisions, and private rights. I have heard that song before. It is the soundtrack of neoliberal rot. When lawmakers change the law in a way that materially benefits landlords, and then some of those same lawmakers expand their property portfolios, the public is entitled to ask whether Parliament has become a real estate syndicate with a debating chamber attached.\n\n* * *\n\n## The Comfortable Thief: The Connection\n\n> The Comfortable Thief, published today on The Māori Green Lantern, names the archetype that runs through the entire story of this government's housing politics. The comfortable thief is not the desperate person who steals to eat. The comfortable thief steals from a position of power, through systems they control, with instruments they designed. They never touch your wallet. They rewrite the rules so your wallet empties into theirs. They do not feel guilt because they have reclassified extraction as entitlement.\n\n“THE COMFORTABLE THIEF” - 28 May 2026How Louise Upston Robs Whānau Blind with a Smile, a Mortgage-Free Apartment, and $52,000 of Your Money — While She Cuts the Floor from Under the PoorThe Māori Green LanternIvor Jones The Māori Green Lantern\n\nThe central figure in The Comfortable Thief is Social Development and Employment Minister Louise Upston. She collects $1,000 per week — $52,000 per year, tax-free\n\n— as a parliamentary accommodation allowance, despite living in her own Wellington apartment, as confirmed by RNZ and reported across multiple outlets.\n\nShe refused to quantify her actual accommodation costs when asked directly by journalists. She said the details were \"damning.\" The allowance appears to substantially exceed any actual housing cost she incurs. She is not paying rent. She may not be servicing a mortgage. She is collecting a public subsidy to live in her own capital city property.\n\nMeanwhile — and this is the part where the dual image of The Comfortable Thief burns brightest — as Social Development Minister, Upston simultaneously tightened welfare eligibility, passed punitive sanctions on beneficiaries, and drove retrospective legislation to legally collect unlawful debts from approximately 40,000 people, including survivors of abuse in state care, people with birth injuries, and sexual abuse survivors, overturning a High Court ruling that had found the debt recovery unlawful, as confirmed by Community Law Centres Aotearoa in February 2025 and reported by Waatea News. The legislation affects approximately 40,000 people. The debts that would have been written off totalled approximately $1 million. Louise Upston's accommodation allowance across a parliamentary term approaches that figure. She is comfortable. She said so.\n\nAs documented in The Comfortable Thief, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon was caught doing the identical thing in 2023 — collecting $1,000 per week for living in his own Wellington apartment — and stopped after public backlash, then stated he had \"no interest\" in changing the rules, as confirmed by the ODT. He did not stop Louise Upston. He protected her. As a YouTube clip of a Ryan Bridge interview from 5 May 2025 surfaced, David Seymour admitted he was \"probably\" taking more housing allowance than he needed. The Comfortable Thief is not a solo act. It is ensemble.\n\n> This is the direct thread between The Comfortable Thief and this essay.\n\n> The Upston accommodation scandal is not a chapter _separate_ from the Landlord Parliament story. It is the same story.\n\nOne group of coalition MPs changed the law to improve their investment returns, then bought more investment properties. Another group used taxpayer accommodation supplements as personal housing subsidies. The Accommodation Supplement itself funnels approximately $1.9 billion annually into landlords' hands — a figure I documented in Elite Plunder Masquerading as Policy: How Luxon's Austerity Fuels Intergenerational Poverty, published May 2025.\n\n> The minister who administers that supplement to beneficiaries extracts it for herself, tax-free, from her own Wellington apartment. The system has two mouths: one pours public money up, the other throttles it before it flows down.\n\n* * *\n\n## Name names\n\nParmjeet Parmar is not a symbol here. She is a named elected official with a documented portfolio. As reported by The Spinoff, she added five new rentals through two redevelopment projects in Half Moon Bay and Bucklands Beach, Auckland. As reported by Scoop, Parmar publicly praised the restoration of mortgage interest deductibility and the \"rebalancing\" of tenancy laws, saying those changes reduced the risk of providing a rental.\n\n> That is the loop. Vote for profit. Praise the profit. Expand the portfolio. Deny the connection. The comfortable thief, in miniature.\n\nKate Nimon also appears in that register trail. As reported by The Spinoff, she said her husband works in rental real estate and purchased three rental properties as part of that work, and she did not answer whether the government's reforms influenced those decisions.\n\n> The question is not whether a spouse can buy property. The question is whether a governing bloc passed a package of landlord-friendly reforms and then, in the shadow of those reforms, materially increased its own stake in the rental market.\n\n> The Speaker, Gerry Brownlee, adds another layer of institutional decay. As reported by The Spinoff, Brownlee said an apparent addition of four properties was the result of earlier incorrect declarations.\n\n> As detailed by NZ Herald, he had been incorrectly and incompletely declaring his property ownership to Parliament for 20 years. That matters because the register is only as honest as the system around it. A self-reporting regime without verification is not transparency. It is theatre. The Comfortable Thief loves theatre.\n\n* * *\n\n## The Wellington mortgage carousel\n\nNow drag the spotlight onto the Wellington accommodation arrangement. As reported by The Spinoff, MPs based outside Wellington can claim up to $36,400 a year toward accommodation, while ministers can claim up to $52,000.\n\n> The same report noted that some MPs choose to buy Wellington apartments and use the taxpayer-funded allowance to help cover the mortgage rather than rent.\n\nRead that again.\n\nPublic money intended to enable democratic service becomes a mechanism for private asset accumulation. That is not merely a perk. It is a class conveyor belt designed by people comfortable enough to never notice how the gears feel to those caught inside them.\n\nThe ugliness deepens in the separate case of Andy Foster. As reported by The Spinoff, Foster claims a $36,000 accommodation top-up to stay in a Wellington home he has owned for 26 years, telling The Spinoff\n\n> \"the cost of owning a home in Wellington is not cheap.\"\n\nThat sentence is a masterclass in elite moral vacancy. There are whānau in this country who cannot afford rent, let alone ownership, and a parliamentarian is publicly defending the taxpayer subsidisation of his housing costs on a property he bought when many current renters were still in primary school.\n\n> Nicola Willis told those same people they had won the lotto, as reported by ODT.\n\nAndy Foster does not believe he won the lotto. He believes he deserves a top-up. Louise Upston collects $1,000 a week and calls her own rules fiscal sustainability. Christopher Luxon collected $1,000 a week and said he had no interest in changing the system that allowed it.\n\n> These are not people who fell through the trapdoor. These are the people who own the floor.\n\n* * *\n\n## Three examples for the western mind\n\n## 1 — The councillor who rezones his own block\n\nIf a city councillor voted to rezone farmland for high-density development, then bought that land through family entities the next month, most western readers would instantly recognise corruption. The same moral principle applies here. As shown by The Spinoff, coalition MPs voted for landlord-friendly changes and then some acquired more investment properties. As explained by ANZ, those changes improved the deductibility of mortgage interest and reduced the bright-line period. The issue is not whether every transaction was lawful. The issue is whether lawmakers materially benefited from market conditions they engineered.\n\nThe tikanga impact: in te ao Māori, the moral legitimacy of rangatira is bound up with responsibility to the collective. Leadership is not defined by what you accumulate. It is defined by what you give. A rangatira who extracts from the collective while restricting others' access to the same collective resources has not merely broken a rule. As The Comfortable Thief argues, they have inverted mana-ākitanga into mana-destroying policy dressed as fiscal responsibility.\n\n**Solution:** mandatory real-time disclosure of any residential investment acquisition during a parliamentary term, and prohibition on voting on housing tax reforms without full divestment or an independently managed blind trust.\n\n## 2 — The director who expenses a holiday apartment\n\nIf a corporate director claimed a housing allowance to cover business travel costs and redirected it to pay the mortgage on a personally owned apartment, shareholders would revolt and the board would act. Yet Parliament has normalised exactly this logic. As reported by The Spinoff, Andy Foster's $36,000 per year accommodation supplement on a 26-year-old property is simply the most visible expression of a system The Comfortable Thief documents in full: Upston at $52,000 per year, Luxon at $52,000 per year (halted under public pressure), Seymour admitting he was \"probably\" overclaiming, and National's confirmation that the threshold for homeowners to access the Accommodation Supplement was lifted from 25% to 30% of income — tightening access at the bottom while the top collects, unchallenged, from the same public fund.\n\nAs The Comfortable Thief documents, the Accommodation Supplement funnels approximately $1.9 billion annually from taxpayers primarily to landlords. A whānau earning $100 per week must now spend $30 of it on housing before the state will offer any assistance. The minister who designed those rules collects $1,000 per week from the same fund, tax-free, for her own property.\n\nThe tikanga impact is a fundamental violation of utu — the principle of reciprocal obligation. Public resources are not a personal entitlement ladder. They are held in trust. To use them for private accumulation while restricting others' access to them is not a policy difference. It is a breach of the collective covenant.\n\n**Solution:** ban accommodation allowances for any MP who owns or co-owns a Wellington property with equity above $200,000. Publish all claims quarterly. Audit annually by the Controller and Auditor-General.\n\n## 3 — The employer who can sack you for no reason\n\nWestern readers understand that job security matters because stable employment supports a stable life. Housing security works the same way. As discussed by The Conversation, restoring no-cause terminations weakens security for tenants directly. As shown by Stats NZ's Housing in Aotearoa 2025 report, 112,496 people were severely housing deprived at the 2023 Census. As further detailed in the full 2025 housing data, Māori had a severe housing deprivation rate of 394 per 10,000 — nearly four times the general population rate. The Salvation Army's rental affordability report confirms that nearly half of lower-income households with children face housing costs above 30% of income.\n\nThe Comfortable Thief adds a further data layer that weaponises this picture: emergency food grant declines have risen by 20% in two years, declines across all special needs grants are up 9%, the emergency housing grant decline rate has jumped from 9% to nearly 40%, and Jobseeker numbers have risen from 2,000 to 12,000 after the sanctions regime was introduced — a policy that has failed on its own stated metric of reducing welfare dependency, as confirmed by the government's own impact assessments which it routinely ignores.\n\nAs the Māori Party stated in 2024, the government committed to $3 billion in landlord tax cuts — more than the value of all Treaty settlements combined. In tikanga, kāinga is not just shelter. It is continuity, belonging, whakapapa made physical. To make eviction easier in a landscape of this deprivation is to deepen social dislocation for whānau already carrying the heaviest load. The MPs who voted to restore no-cause evictions, and who now own eight, five, and three investment properties respectively, have made it easier to sever whānau from their kāinga. That is not policy. That is cultural violence with a legal signature.\n\n**Solution:** reinstate cause-only terminations. Expand state and community housing. Fund Māori-led responses. Reverse the $3 billion landlord subsidy back into state housing construction and direct Māori housing programmes.\n\n* * *\n\n## The harm to Māori whānau\n\nThe broader housing picture confirms this is not an abstract ethics argument. Rental affordability worsened in the private market, hitting Māori and Pacific communities disproportionately, as reported by The Salvation Army and its rental affordability report. Emergency housing rejections surged with Māori continuing to bear the brunt, as reported by Te Ao Māori News in March 2026. Homelessness is rising across Aotearoa, as confirmed by the Salvation Army and World Socialist Web Site's January 2026 analysis. Auckland housing remains out of reach for thousands of whānau, as reported by Waatea News.\n\nThe Comfortable Thief also connects Upston's welfare sanctions regime to the same Māori housing crisis. New welfare reforms confirmed by Waatea News in May 2025 will hurt Māori most — a fact the government has access to through its own impact assessments, which it routinely ignores. Whānau disproportionately on welfare, disproportionately in private rentals, disproportionately homeless, are now simultaneously losing housing security through no-cause evictions and losing income security through benefit sanctions for missing a phone call. The minister who designed those sanctions collects $1,000 per week from a system that would sanction a beneficiary for identical behaviour.\n\nI have been writing about this pattern for years. On this same theme of housing as systematic extraction, I direct you to They Don't Want to Fix Homelessness. They Want to Hide It from View, published March 2026. On the motel generation: The Motel Generation and the Man Who Calls It \"Success\". On the full Māori housing archive: Māori Housing tag. On Kāinga Ora's 1,248% increase in eviction notices: Housing Is a Right, Not a Privilege. On the neoliberal assault on tenancy rights: Unmasking the Neoliberal Assault on Tenants' Rights. On the property sector's $150 million tax avoidance: Te Pā Harakeke o te Pākehā. On the Upston-Luxon-Seymour accommodation rort and welfare sanctions in full: The Comfortable Thief.\n\n* * *\n\n## The five hidden connections: Te Whakatūāhu\n\nHere is the whakapapa of extraction in plain view — and how it connects across both essays.\n\n**First** , the legislative-profit loop: pass landlord-friendly laws, improve investor returns, acquire more property, then defend the policy settings that enrich you, as shown by The Spinoff, ANZ and Davenports Law. The Comfortable Thief's masterwork: engineer the rules, then profit from them.\n\n**Second** , the dual accommodation rort: coalition MPs use Wellington accommodation supplements to service private mortgages, as described by The Spinoff, while the Social Development Minister simultaneously collects $52,000 per year from the same fund she administers for beneficiaries, as documented in The Comfortable Thief. Two faces of the same extraction.\n\n**Third** , the eviction-to-demand loop: weaken tenant protections, as covered by The Conversation, increase housing instability, which increases demand for the rentals the same MPs just acquired. Meanwhile Upston's sanctions regime, as detailed in The Comfortable Thief, pushes more people toward housing precarity, which further inflates the rental market that those MPs are now more heavily invested in.\n\n**Fourth** , the register and system integrity failure: a disclosure regime without verification or enforcement, as demonstrated by Brownlee's 20-year misdeclaration reported by NZ Herald, mirrors the comfortable impunity documented in The Comfortable Thief — a minister who refuses to disclose her actual accommodation costs, a Prime Minister who said he had \"no interest\" in changing rules that personally benefit him. The entire system depends on shame operating as a deterrent. These people feel no shame.\n\n**Fifth** , the racialised burden that threads every data point: when rental insecurity and housing deprivation fall disproportionately on Māori, and when welfare sanctions fall disproportionately on Māori, and when policies reward investors while punishing renters and beneficiaries — the combined effect is a racialised wealth transfer. As documented by Stats NZ, The Salvation Army and Te Ao Māori News, Māori are not merely disproportionately represented in housing deprivation. They are the primary target of every policy in this package. The Comfortable Thief has always disproportionately picked Māori pockets.\n\n* * *\n\n## Ko au, Ko te taiaha\n\n> I am not interested in the etiquette of empire. I am interested in the evidence.\n\n> The evidence says this government passed pro-landlord reforms, as explained by ANZ and Davenports Law.\n\n> The evidence says coalition MPs then added at least 25 more properties, as reported by The Spinoff.\n\n> The evidence says Māori remain disproportionately harmed by the housing crisis, as recorded by Stats NZ, The Salvation Army and Te Ao Māori News.\n\n> The evidence says Nicola Willis called your social housing a lottery win, as reported by ODT.\n\n> The evidence says Louise Upston is comfortable — she said so herself — collecting $1,000 per week from the public purse while sanctioning beneficiaries for missed phone calls, as documented in The Comfortable Thief.\n\n> The evidence says Gerry Brownlee misfiled his property for 20 years with no consequence, as revealed by NZ Herald.\n\n> The evidence says the Accommodation Supplement funnels $1.9 billion annually to landlords, as I documented in Elite Plunder Masquerading as Policy.\n\n> The evidence says the comfortable thieves govern from the register of pecuniary interests.\n\n> The whakataukī says: _He aha te mea nui o te ao? He tāngata, he tāngata, he tāngata._ What is the greatest thing in the world? It is people, it is people, it is people.\n\n> This government has answered: _He rawa, he rawa, he rawa._ It is property, it is property, it is property.\n\nThat is not a policy difference. That is a declaration of who they serve — and who they have decided does not fully count. I wield the taiaha. I name the harm. I name the government. I name the ministers. I will not stop.\n\n* * *\n\n## Koha — He Tono ki a Koutou\n\nThis essay — and The Comfortable Thief it now stands alongside — exist because someone has to count the properties, trace the allowances, name the ministers, and say plainly what the evidence shows while the comfortable thieves count their rent.\n\nEvery koha to this mahi funds the accountability that Parliament is designed to avoid. It funds Māori voices naming Māori harm in Māori terms — because the Crown will not, the mainstream media softens it, and the algorithm buries it. It signals that rangatiratanga includes the power to fund our own truth-tellers.\n\nLouise Upston collects $52,000 per year from the public purse, tax-free, for her apartment. Every koha to The Māori Green Lantern funds the accountability she is comfortable enough to avoid. Kia kaha, whānau.\n\n🌿 **Koha:** app.koha.kiwi/events/the-maori-green-lantern-fighting-misinformation-and-disinformation-ivor-jones\n\n📬 **Subscribe for essays:** themaorigreenlantern.maori.nz/#/portal/support\n\n🏦 **Direct bank transfer:** HTDM 03-1546-0415173-000\n\n📘 **Facebook:** facebook.com/Themaorigreenlantern/subscribe\n\nIf koha is not possible — subscribe, follow, kōrero, share with your whānau and friends. That is koha in itself. Every share takes this evidence into a room where someone needed to hear it.\n\n> Kia kaha, whānau. Stay vigilant. Stay connected.\n\n* * *\n\n* * *\n\n*Views expressed constitute honest opinion on matters of public interest under the Defamation Act 1992 (NZ) and Durie v Gardiner",
  "title": "\"THE LANDLORD PARLIAMENT: HOW AOTEAROA'S RULING CLASS VOTED ITSELF RICH WHILE WHĀNAU SLEPT IN CARS\" - 28 May 2026",
  "updatedAt": "2026-05-27T18:07:15.250Z"
}