{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreihybmu54pawc4enctq2typn4pt3llg3k3mee4ph3bflw55iwltv6i",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:wwyqal4cnqhuwyacdj7rqq3n/app.bsky.feed.post/3mla5q23437i2"
  },
  "path": "/t/censored-binomial-models/28732#post_3",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-06T17:52:43.000Z",
  "site": "https://discourse.datamethods.org",
  "textContent": "The derivation of the censored likelihood looks correct, but I wonder in this case, because the physicians have to choose it might be best to approach it via a Bradley-Terry/discrete choice type model. I known in the uncensored case Bradley-Terry ends up being equivalent to logistic regression, provided the winner/binary coding is kept consistent. I wonder if the consistency holds for the “win m of n” trials when censoring is present.\n\nThis might be one of the cases where it’s worth it to go through the combinatorics and derive the appropriate pmf probabilities directly.",
  "title": "Censored binomial models"
}