{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreibq36yow54apjsoimzemqm72bpvqxqpsfpn5v5ny4jfw4nmzsph2a",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:wwyqal4cnqhuwyacdj7rqq3n/app.bsky.feed.post/3mfmbs3kdj6a2"
  },
  "path": "/t/change-the-range-not-the-language-on-confidence-intervals/27740?page=2#post_25",
  "publishedAt": "2026-02-24T13:17:34.000Z",
  "site": "https://discourse.datamethods.org",
  "textContent": "This is getting away from what researchers need. In the classical statistics world, one specifies a “coverage” probability and the procedure returns two limits. In practice it is much more common to desire the probability that the true unknown effect is within a researcher-specified interval that defines a clinically meaningful range.",
  "title": "Change the range not the language on confidence intervals"
}