{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreigl533nfgcbdwkuxpp3t3hva63375j66rj2kwqtrhtdgupotq7vtu",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:vtxoj4nvky7vqx2woiqtab75/app.bsky.feed.post/3miqqw2kozwj2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreibviyxaipfafdzipnvkvs73k5zqqg33v6q5zuowniwai2mrkkk5ua"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/png",
    "size": 37445
  },
  "path": "/post/813044493515472896",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-05T09:00:51.000Z",
  "site": "https://echo.tumblr.com",
  "tags": [
    "madlori",
    "onusjott",
    "anarchistmemedistro",
    "sentimentalslut"
  ],
  "textContent": "madlori:\n\n> onusjott:\n>\n>> anarchistmemedistro:\n>>\n>>> sentimentalslut:\n>>>\n>>>> sentimentalslut:\n>>>>\n>>>>> “very guilty and problematic client” holy copaganda batman\n>>>>\n>>>> let’s start parsing who does and doesn’t deserve representation and assign moral weight to agreeing to protect their rights I don’t see how this could possibly go wrong\n>>>\n>>> ALT\n>>\n>> This is the endpoint of assigning morality based on ontologies of people. You wind up with the simplest ontology: good or bad.\n>\n> Getting tired of saying this but\n>\n> # THE POINT OF A DEFENSE ATTORNEY ISN’T TO GET THEIR CLIENT OFF. IT’S TO MAKE THE STATE PROVE THEIR CASE AND DO THEIR DUE DILIGENCE.\n>\n> # IT’S TO PROVIDE A CHECK ON THE POWER OF THE STATE TO JUST THROW PEOPLE IN JAIL.\n>\n> If someone “gets off” because of a technicality that means the state DID NOT DO THAT.",
  "title": "“very guilty and problematic client” holy copaganda batman"
}