{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreihm2hauhnd35ovdd5zy4tyn5bhpct6j6bweu6vwxzvifpbxfs6nbq",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:vcnj3w3doq5jwfre72eplofy/app.bsky.feed.post/3mmtvdmo2vm42"
  },
  "description": "CedarDB ran a recent performance test with a 3+ year old version of CockroachDB, but presented the results as if they're recent",
  "path": "/cedardb-jumping-on-the-yugabyte-lack-of-ethics-train/",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-27T16:08:36.000Z",
  "site": "https://davidbressler.com",
  "tags": [
    "performance improvements we've made over the past 18 months",
    "done this before",
    "CedarDB publishing performance results",
    "version 23.2"
  ],
  "textContent": "I'll keep it short.\n\nThe takeaway seems to be that our competitors can't keep up with the performance improvements we've made over the past 18 months, and so benchmark against 3+ year old versions of CockroachDB hoping no one will notice.\n\nYugabyte's done this before, this time it's CedarDB publishing performance results in April of 2026 using CockroachDB version 23.2 (it's in the readme on Github).\n\nCedarDB doesn't really come up much as a competitor, so maybe they're just looking for attention?",
  "title": "CedarDB Jumping on the Yugabyte (Lack of) Ethics Train",
  "updatedAt": "2026-05-27T16:08:37.555Z"
}