{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreicrcqlg4yfqmtu4kq273a7xptt4jirqdypssata2jpjupykdd5smm",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:uxkrhzvf6obbsoh5nf2gkpj5/app.bsky.feed.post/3mkbeccom2uy2"
  },
  "path": "/why-c-remains-the-gold-standard-for-cryptographic-software/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=why-c-remains-the-gold-standard-for-cryptographic-software",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-24T20:00:57.000Z",
  "site": "https://www.wolfssl.com",
  "tags": [
    "Uncategorized"
  ],
  "textContent": "Executive Summary For production cryptographic software, memory safety alone does not define security. Real-world crypto must run on every platform, maintain stable assumptions over decades, and allow explicit control over hardware behavior. While memory-safe languages like Rust offer real benefits, serious cryptographic implementations inevitably rely on unsafe code, assembly, and low-level control, eroding those guarantees. […]",
  "title": "Why C Remains the Gold Standard for Cryptographic Software"
}