{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreibhw2nne3yk5e3j2f62sx4mef3isclze677ph3kztjhxgmld4r2wa",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:u7g3ox56lanys3sv6wciromg/app.bsky.feed.post/3mm3vvqgte322"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreiczpqvcciafvb3vpq3gwiwwcbdboyl2qymcgxs2xp2l2o2bw2ruia"
    },
    "mimeType": "binary/octet-stream",
    "size": 159840
  },
  "path": "/article/1092899/three-reasons-why-west-bengals-sir-exercise-was-unconstitutional?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=public",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-18T01:00:01.000Z",
  "site": "https://scroll.in",
  "textContent": "The Supreme Court should have upheld the voting rights of those excluded due to ‘logical discrepancies’ until the category’s statutory basis was disclosed.",
  "title": "Three reasons why West Bengal’s SIR exercise was unconstitutional"
}