{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreigphzbwksnjgzkjxknkmu5s47kyz6ldmkrhnhs4cxpfgibzwbmrra",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:tr4cib3u27qz5ltiassjlr7b/app.bsky.feed.post/3mls3k5aptcj2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreidbaxuvwcjk354zijarcw543m2lzljqhfljqxyu2nvi6r7g2jx4xy"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 194744
  },
  "path": "/cavs/2026/05/should-cavs-have-been-called-for-a-foul-at-end-of-regulation-referee-addresses-controversial-no-call.html",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-14T04:44:05.000Z",
  "site": "https://www.cleveland.com",
  "textContent": "Referee Tony Brothers, the closest official to the final play of regulation, waved off what he deemed incidental contact and sent the game into overtime.",
  "title": "Should Cavs have been called for a foul at end of regulation of Game 5 OT win? Referee addresses controversial no-call"
}