{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreigvkgmktpfi7mlz25jk7sz4sz25mczrccmnc6y24zpxhwjuy43g5m",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:tr2hyqppz6ss2lgprxeougme/app.bsky.feed.post/3mm6xtrnuyb62"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreigp7naarcdxa27juyqpgw3dnsi33iy35aukm4aldlqw4rkly2kymq"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 1054140
  },
  "path": "/posts/geofence-warrants-location-data-and-the-fourth-amendment-in-the-digital-age/",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-18T15:04:01.000Z",
  "site": "https://puri.sm",
  "tags": [
    "Industry News",
    "Privacy",
    "Security",
    "Consumer Privacy",
    "Consumer Protection",
    "cybersecurity",
    "Geofence Warrants, Location Data, and the Fourth Amendment in the Digital Age",
    "Purism"
  ],
  "textContent": "The Supreme Court’s consideration of geofence warrants represents one of the most technically and constitutionally significant privacy cases of the modern era. The core issue is whether bulk collection of location metadata—generated by consumer devices and cloud-based services—can coexist with the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable searches.\n\nThe post Geofence Warrants, Location Data, and the Fourth Amendment in the Digital Age appeared first on Purism.",
  "title": "Geofence Warrants, Location Data, and the Fourth Amendment in the Digital Age"
}