Brandchannel interbred

SimonCox September 9, 2004
Source
Recently brandchannel.com reviewed a commercial web site that I have spent the past five years dramatically improving. The site in question now conforms to WAI AA standards, is fully CSS driven, has a crisp conservative design that supports its brand extremely well but the Brandchannel reviewer gave it a right good pasting because it is not pushing the boundaries that they have decided need pushing. Actually the site pushes a lot more boundaries than the brandchannel.com site itself, which is not accessible, does not use css, does not validate for html, has predictably crap design and from a company that steers large corporate marketing departments on branding and design is not a very good shop window. I mean look at those stupid animated animated lozenges. Very 1997. Actually Interbrand, who run brandchannel as a sales portal, used to do a lot of work for the company reviewed but recently lost its contract - hence the potentially libellous headlines used I suspect. No bitterness there at all then... Interbrand are quickly loosing credibility as a leading light on brand direction – they may have become "Interbred". This rant is my own personal opinion and is not the opinion of the company that was reviewed on brandchannel. Probably.

Discussion in the ATmosphere

Loading comments...