{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreiftapiwkon5sn4ptrdms25owm5cydripu6ktpicvkmm3ib6lv4lge",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:t2milkrl2heasqhby7c52ii3/app.bsky.feed.post/3mmkcmvtogl62"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreicthphjejpuhmealwp5sjqrqat24ycnyxkmnjsfr2v5n5uksz54li"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 257441
  },
  "path": "/75th-anniversary-of-chinas-peaceful-liberation-of-tibet-a-historical-rebuttal-and-analysis-of-political-terminology/",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-23T17:31:43.000Z",
  "site": "https://www.tibetanreview.net",
  "tags": [
    "Articles",
    "Opinions"
  ],
  "textContent": "OPINION Gyaltsen Choedak* contends that the narrative on the “17-Point Agreement” is as much about China’s illegal annexation of Tibet in the name of “peaceful liberation” as it is about getting the terminology underlying the coerced signing of this document right. Today marks the 75th anniversary of the signing of the so-called “Seventeen-Point Agreement” on […]",
  "title": "75th Anniversary of China’s ‘Peaceful Liberation of Tibet’: A Historical Rebuttal and Analysis of Political Terminology"
}