{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreicn6p7tyzpujlpssuvgwnvopurawrwjenuntldl2tprl4ui4a75pm",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:sl2hrcwo6voaorzsr26d3bo2/app.bsky.feed.post/3mot7myusx4n2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreifehqahpcfb7pxobmasgrdwt4pjmelwyiofglhlttafdtwvvifshm"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 380854
  },
  "description": "Many voters will continue to ask whether he and his ally Tama Potaka are merely managing the pace of constitutional change rather than challenging it. And if that question continues to grow, Luxon may discover that silence carries a political cost of its own.",
  "path": "/his-silence-is-becoming-deafening/",
  "publishedAt": "2026-06-21T20:30:34.000Z",
  "site": "https://goodoil.news",
  "tags": [
    "Geoff Parker",
    "latest meeting with iwi leaders",
    "Breaking Views"
  ],
  "textContent": "Geoff Parker\n_Geoff Parker is a passionate advocate for equal rights and a colour blind society._\n\n> _I have been talking to iwi leaders ... for the past 12 months\n>\n>  –_ Christopher Luxon, April 2025\n\nPrime Minister Christopher Luxon's latest meeting with iwi leaders raises an important question: **who exactly is he governing for?**\n\nNo reasonable New Zealander would object to the prime minister meeting Māori leaders. In a democratic country, governments should engage with all sectors of society. Farmers, business owners, unions, community groups, churches, environmental organisations and iwi all have a right to be heard.\n\nThe problem is not that Luxon met with iwi leaders.The problem is that iwi leaders increasingly appear to enjoy **a privileged position in shaping government policy,** while many concerned New Zealanders are left wondering who is standing up for them.\n\nThe National Iwi Chairs Forum requested this meeting after objecting to the government's review of Treaty clauses throughout legislation. Their complaint was that they **had not been** **sufficiently consulted** before cabinet considered reforms.\n\n**Think about that for a moment.**\n\nThe government was elected by the people of New Zealand. It has a democratic mandate to review legislation. Yet iwi leaders are effectively arguing that government policy affecting all New Zealanders **should not proceed without their approval or participation.**\n\nThat is not democracy. **That is the gradual elevation of one group above all others.**\n\nChristopher Luxon should be meeting with New Zealanders **from every walk of life with the same enthusiasm he shows for iwi leadership**. Where are the special forums for ratepayers concerned about co-governance? Where are the closed-door meetings with taxpayers who fund the growing network of race-based programmes? Where are the invitations to the millions of New Zealanders who simply believe that every citizen should have equal rights and equal political influence **regardless of ancestry?**\n\nMany New Zealanders are becoming increasingly concerned about the **steady expansion of Treaty-based provisions** throughout government, local government, resource management, health, education and public administration. They see a growing system in which ethnicity determines influence, consultation rights, representation and access to public resources.\n\nYet on these concerns, **Luxon remains largely silent**.\n\nEven more disappointing was his role in killing ACT's Treaty Principles Bill.\n\nWhether one supported the bill or opposed it, the proposal sought to answer a fundamental question: what are the principles that should govern the relationship between citizens and the state in modern New Zealand?\n\nACT argued that all New Zealanders should enjoy **equal political rights and equal treatment** under the law. Millions of New Zealanders supported at least having that debate.\n\n**Instead, Luxon shut it down.**\n\nBy refusing to allow a **meaningful national conversation about the Treaty and its place in modern governance,** he sent a clear message. The political establishment was prepared to discuss almost anything **except the growing influence of Treaty-based governance itself**.\n\nThe result is that many New Zealanders now feel politically homeless. **They watch as more powers, consultation requirements and decision-making influence flow toward tribal organisations** , while politicians dismiss concerns about democratic equality as somehow unreasonable.\n\nLuxon insists his government is merely seeking clarity around Treaty clauses. If that is true, then why does he appear so reluctant to challenge the continual expansion of Treaty-based obligations throughout public life? **And since when did iwi leaders become the final arbiters of what the Treaty means?** The Treaty was drafted by representatives of the Crown, written first in English and then translated into Māori. Its interpretation affects the rights and responsibilities of every New Zealander. **It should not be treated as the exclusive preserve of any one group.**\n\nThe Treaty belongs to New Zealand’s history, but its interpretation shapes New Zealand’s future. **That future affects every citizen** , and the conversation **should never be confined** to politicians, judges, bureaucrats and iwi leaders alone.\n\nHis critics increasingly see a prime minister who talks about economic growth while **avoiding** the constitutional questions that concern many voters. They see **a leader who appears more comfortable negotiating with iwi leaders than confronting the growing public unease about race-based governance**.\n\nFair or unfair, that perception is becoming harder to ignore.\n\n**Christopher Luxon was elected to govern for all New Zealanders.** Not just those with political influence. Not just those with Treaty settlements. Not just those with access to ministers and government departments.\n\nAll New Zealanders.\n\nUntil he demonstrates that commitment more clearly, many voters will continue to ask whether he and his ally Tama Potaka are **merely managing the pace of constitutional change rather than challenging it**.\n\nAnd if that question continues to grow, **Luxon may discover that silence carries a political cost of its own.**\n\nThis article was originally published by Breaking Views.",
  "title": "His Silence Is Becoming Deafening",
  "updatedAt": "2026-06-21T20:30:33.504Z"
}