{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreieqs3ty5zgsxrii33ot7c4w53gfakagnotgybx4ib24rt6mbf4a4q",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:sl2hrcwo6voaorzsr26d3bo2/app.bsky.feed.post/3mmpgexzxb372"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreibtngw6jmocczw2v7i46zhwcgw66gxcaoif7shwcifnr3m7fowave"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 1334983
  },
  "description": "The first reading exposed something alarming: a chunk of our political class has less grasp of biological reality than the average three-year-old.",
  "path": "/mps-who-cant-tell-boys-from-girls/",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-25T21:30:10.000Z",
  "site": "https://goodoil.news",
  "tags": [
    "Rodney Hide",
    "Brash and Mitchell"
  ],
  "textContent": "Rodney Hide\n_Rodney Hide is a former minister and ACT Party leader._\n\nWhat a revealing night we had last week in parliament.\n\nThe Legislation (Definitions of Woman and Man) Amendment Bill had its first reading – a modest, common-sense attempt to insert basic biological reality into law: a woman is an adult human biological female; a man is an adult human biological male.\n\nYet the opposition’s response was pure ideological theatre.\n\nLabour’s Vanushi Walters called it “irresponsible” and a “platform for hate”. Chlöe Swarbrick declared, “What is a woman? Whatever the hell she wants to be.” Glen Bennett spoke emotionally about his identity while implying the bill marginalises trans people. Oriini Kaipara invoked Māori philosophy to suggest the bill discriminates.\n\nOne is left genuinely confused. These are elected lawmakers – supposedly intelligent adults — standing in the House arguing against a truth that toddlers master by age two.\n\nHere is the biology they seem unable to grasp.\n\nSex is determined at the moment of conception. The chromosomal combination (XX or XY) is fixed the instant the sperm meets the egg. That genetic reality exists in **every single cell** of the body – trillions of them – except the gametes. From the earliest embryonic stage, males and females follow different developmental pathways. This is not assigned at birth. It is immutable biological fact.\n\nBy 18–24 months, normal children can reliably distinguish male from female. By age three, most can correctly identify themselves and others as boy or girl. This is hardwired human cognition.\n\nYet here we have MPs who apparently cannot make the same distinction. They treat biological sex as optional, fluid, or “whatever the hell she wants to be”. They lecture the rest of us about “hate” for simply wanting laws grounded in observable reality.\n\nJenny Marcroft was right: women fought for sex-based rights for over a century. Those rights — safety, fairness in sport, privacy in single-sex spaces — are now under sustained attack.\n\nFor the men, remember: the MPs who voted against this bill want men who simply say they are women entering your mother’s, wife’s, girlfriend’s, or daughter’s changing rooms and toilets. For the women, remember: the MPs voting against this bill don’t want you safe.\n\nThis is not compassion. It is ideological capture. It is adults sacrificing women’s safety, fairness, and dignity on the altar of the latest progressive delusion. Protecting sex-based rights does not deny anyone’s right to live free from harassment. It simply refuses to erase the meaning of “woman” and “man” from our laws.\n\nThe bill has gone to select committee. Good. Let New Zealanders speak. But the first reading exposed something alarming: a chunk of our political class has less grasp of biological reality than the average three-year-old.\n\nThat is not a good look for the people we pay to make our laws. Parliament should pass this bill and restore clarity, sanity, and basic decency to the statute book.\n\nThis article was published by Brash and Mitchell.",
  "title": "MPs Who Can’t Tell Boys From Girls",
  "updatedAt": "2026-05-25T21:30:09.458Z"
}