{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreifweqijr4escovzcrsph4vema5eddohs2cwhbx6e7qqlnvgjatlku",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:sl2hrcwo6voaorzsr26d3bo2/app.bsky.feed.post/3mmafbxonc6q2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreigtu4teufpt4gc6hsz425nzdehlfqv3l7m4rfuiq3lijdvoolqabu"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/png",
    "size": 1975915
  },
  "description": "10 News Stories They Chose Not to Tell You",
  "path": "/your-daily-ten-10-2026-089/",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-19T22:00:48.000Z",
  "site": "https://goodoil.news",
  "tags": [
    "Read More",
    "Subscribe now"
  ],
  "textContent": "**This is edition 2026/089 of the _Ten@10_ newsletter.**\n\nHi all,\n\nThis is the Ten@10, where I collate and summarise ten news items you generally won't see in the mainstream media.\n\nEnjoy!\n\n* * *\n\n## 1. A cross-dressing man trumps a real woman’s rights\n\n _Jenny Ruth's Just the Business_\n\n  * ⚖️ A three-judge panel of Australia's Federal Court ruled that businesswoman **Sall Grover unlawfully directly discriminated against Roxanne Tickle** by excluding him from her women-only app, Giggle for Girls.\n  * 🏛️ The ruling overturned the original judge's finding that the discrimination had been **indirect rather than direct** , a distinction with significant legal consequences for women-only spaces.\n  * 📜 The relevant law is Australia's **Sex Discrimination Act 1984** , amended in 2013 under Julia Gillard's Labor government to include \"gender identity\" as a protected attribute.\n  * ⚠️ The judgment effectively means Australian women must **apply for a formal exemption** from the Sex Discrimination Act before they can legally hold women-only events excluding male-born persons.\n  * 🔍 Justices Melissa Perry, Wendy Abraham, and Geoffrey Kennett used trans-ideological language throughout, including **\"misgendering,\" sex \"assigned\" at birth, and \"cisgender\"** to describe biological women.\n  * 🔥 The judges found Grover's refusal to use female pronouns for Tickle **\"gratuitous, disrespectful and unnecessary,\"** even though the biological sex of Tickle was the central factual matter of the case.\n  * 💰 Grover was ordered to pay Tickle **A$20,000 in compensation plus A$100,000 in legal costs** , double the original damages award, though half of what Tickle had originally sought.\n  * 📊 Tickle claimed anti-anxiety medication was needed due to Grover's conduct, but the court noted **no medical evidence was provided** to support that claim.\n  * 🏢 Tickle's case was backed by **Australia's Human Rights Commission, a A$50,000 University of New South Wales grant, and pro-bono legal assistance** from Barry Nilsson lawyers.\n  * 👥 Grover received no comparable institutional support and has spent **more than four years defending herself** in court proceedings.\n  * 🛑 Grover's Giggle for Girls app is now **defunct** , shut down because she refuses to operate a women-only platform that includes biological males.\n  * ⚖️ The judges dismissed Grover's stated fear of Tickle as **\"disingenuous,\"** ruling she must have known Tickle obtained her mobile number from her own email signature.\n  * 📉 The judgment reduces the biological fact of Tickle's sex to merely **Grover's personal \"belief,\"** treating an empirical claim as a matter of contested opinion.\n  * 🌍 The Sex Discrimination Act was originally designed to implement the **UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women** , adopted in 1979 before gender identity ideology emerged.\n\n\n\nRead More\n\n### This post is for subscribers only\n\nBecome a member to get access to all content\n\nSubscribe now",
  "title": "Your Daily Ten@10 - 2026/089",
  "updatedAt": "2026-05-19T22:00:48.283Z"
}