Your Daily Ten@10 - 2026/081

This is edition 2026/081 of the Ten@10 newsletter.

Hi all,

This is the Ten@10, where I collate and summarise ten news items you generally won't see in the mainstream media.

Enjoy!

1. Who really wants a Grand Coalition between Labour and National?

Ani O'Brien

• 🏛️ Grand Coalition Proposal: Advocates frame a Labour–National coalition as pragmatic and stabilising, citing international examples and economic necessity.
• ⚖️ Democracy Undermined: Critics argue it repackages political failure and overrides voters’ preferences, sidelining smaller parties that reflect genuine public choice under MMP.
• 🎯 MMP Functioning: Influence of minor parties is a feature, not a flaw; proportional representation allows voters to express nuanced political and demographic preferences.
• 📉 Class Narrowing: While MMP improves ethnic and gender representation, Parliament remains dominated by a professional, urban, managerial class, reducing working-class representation.
• 📰 Media Fantasies: Coverage imagining coalition Cabinets (e.g., Audrey Young) ignores whether voters want it, reducing politics to technocratic optimisation.
• 🏢 Governance Risks: A grand coalition could consolidate power, weaken scrutiny, encourage incremental bureaucratic entrenchment, and marginalise meaningful alternatives.
• 🌍 International Lessons: German grand coalitions show that merging major parties can erode support bases, fuel insurgent movements, and make politics brittle rather than resilient.
• 💥 Elite Mindset: Proposal reflects discomfort with voter autonomy and a desire for control by the political class, rather than addressing actual policy failures.
• 🌈 Pluralism Needed: True democratic adaptation requires embracing political disagreement and a diversity of voices, not reducing it to a two-party technocracy.

Read More

This post is for subscribers only

Become a member to get access to all content

Subscribe now