{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreia6viqp2e22gwm4sa25ci26jt4fts6pkndz3a667eg6hkqkfh5phq",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:sl2hrcwo6voaorzsr26d3bo2/app.bsky.feed.post/3ml56qvtu7wv2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreigtu4teufpt4gc6hsz425nzdehlfqv3l7m4rfuiq3lijdvoolqabu"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/png",
    "size": 1975915
  },
  "description": "10 News Stories They Chose Not to Tell You",
  "path": "/your-daily-ten-10-2026-079/",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-05T22:00:36.000Z",
  "site": "https://goodoil.news",
  "tags": [
    "Read More",
    "Subscribe now"
  ],
  "textContent": "**This is edition 2026/079 of the _Ten@10_ newsletter.**\n\nHi all,\n\nThis is the Ten@10, where I collate and summarise ten news items you generally won't see in the mainstream media.\n\nEnjoy!\n\n* * *\n\n## 1. Don't Go There!\n\nChris Trotter\n\n  * 🏛️ **Historical lesson ignored:** National’s previous fallout with Winston Peters cost them nine years out of power; they seem poised to repeat this mistake.\n  * ⚖️ **Coalition risks underestimated:** National’s attempts to undermine NZ First could backfire, leaving the Right without a crucial coalition partner.\n  * 📉 **Poll implications:** Weakening NZ First may recover some voters for National, but not enough to reach John Key-era levels; mid-30s polling likely insufficient for victory.\n  * 🔄 **Populist backlash:** Peters could respond to perceived betrayal with a strong populist counter-attack, consolidating NZ First support and challenging National.\n  * 🧾 **Political risk:** Nicola Willis’ comments questioning Peters’ competence could provoke him to showcase effectiveness, increasing political tension during an “austerity” Budget.\n  * 🤝 **Labour-NZ First coalition potential:** A populist push by Peters could align NZ First with Labour, appealing to voters seeking balance between pragmatism and populist representation.\n  * 💥 **National’s strategic blunder:** Attacking Peters and NZ First risks creating the very coalition National sought to prevent, highlighting their misjudgment of political dynamics.\n  * 🧠 **Leadership contrast:** National’s leaders historically struggled to sell pragmatic strategies internally, while Peters’ political acumen consistently maximizes voter appeal.\n  * 📌 **Key insight:** National underestimates the necessity of respecting Peters’ influence; failing to do so could make a Labour-NZ First coalition seem inevitable, despite National’s intentions.\n\n\n\nRead More\n\n### This post is for subscribers only\n\nBecome a member to get access to all content\n\nSubscribe now",
  "title": "Your Daily Ten@10 - 2026/079",
  "updatedAt": "2026-05-05T22:00:35.627Z"
}