{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreie5i4kjusef4k73bccax5pdl744is7uk5m252fbi43otrqrtsoz3q",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:sl2hrcwo6voaorzsr26d3bo2/app.bsky.feed.post/3mjiewpkejjd2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreigtu4teufpt4gc6hsz425nzdehlfqv3l7m4rfuiq3lijdvoolqabu"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/png",
    "size": 1975915
  },
  "description": "10 News Stories They Chose Not to Tell You",
  "path": "/your-daily-ten-10-2026-065/",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-14T22:00:04.000Z",
  "site": "https://goodoil.news",
  "tags": [
    "Read More",
    "Subscribe now"
  ],
  "textContent": "**This is edition 2026/065 of the _Ten@10_ newsletter.**\n\nHi all,\n\nThis is the Ten@10, where I collate and summarise ten news items you generally won't see in the mainstream media.\n\nEnjoy!\n\n* * *\n\n## 1. NEOTRIBAL CAPITALISM AND CO-GOVERNANCE\n\nElizabeth Rata\n\n  * 💰 Capitalism generates prosperity, but its drive to accumulate must be restrained by democratic political regulation.\n  * ⚠️ “Neotribal corporations” merge economic and political power, making their influence opaque and difficult to challenge.\n  * ⚖️ Democracy depends on separating politics from both religion and the economy; co-governance is presented as undermining this separation.\n  * 🧑‍⚖️ Liberalism is identified as the only system that protects this divide by prioritising the individual citizen over tribal or class-based identity.\n  * 🇳🇿 Neotribal capitalism emerged in New Zealand from Treaty settlement structures, evolving into vehicles for political influence and co-governance demands.\n  * 📈 Like all elites, leaders of these corporations are driven by accumulation of wealth and power, extending beyond historical reparations.\n  * 🏛️ Effective capitalism requires regulation through democratic accountability to ensure fair access to shared national resources.\n  * 🧠 Ideological strategies have been used to justify expanded claims to resources and political authority beyond original settlements.\n  * 📚 The “culturalist Left” is criticised for enabling this shift through education, including diminished secularism and reinterpretations of history.\n  * 🏫 Secularism’s decline is seen as enabling tribal-based belief systems to influence public institutions and governance.\n  * 📖 An “invented history” narrative reframes the Treaty as a partnership and emphasises oppression, sidelining broader historical realities.\n  * 🤝 The New Left is portrayed as mistakenly aligning with neotribal elites, believing shared goals despite differing interests.\n  * 🧬 Racial identity is elevated over individual citizenship, conflicting with democratic principles based on universal equality.\n  * 💸 Neotribal elites are characterised as rent-seekers, benefiting from control of resources rather than productive innovation.\n  * 🚫 Co-governance between tribal and democratic systems is argued to be fundamentally incompatible.\n  * ⏳ The text questions whether New Zealand has reached a tipping point in this shift and calls for a return to liberal democratic principles.\n\n\n\nRead More\n\n### This post is for subscribers only\n\nBecome a member to get access to all content\n\nSubscribe now",
  "title": "Your Daily Ten@10 - 2026/065",
  "updatedAt": "2026-04-14T22:00:04.482Z"
}