{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreicxnb24viwypqbspiqx52mnmrklwazktxpylzvd5btdmcn3vixb2a",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:sl2hrcwo6voaorzsr26d3bo2/app.bsky.feed.post/3mickll5ggv72"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreigtu4teufpt4gc6hsz425nzdehlfqv3l7m4rfuiq3lijdvoolqabu"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/png",
    "size": 1975915
  },
  "description": "10 News Stories They Chose Not to Tell You",
  "path": "/your-daily-ten-10-2026-056/",
  "publishedAt": "2026-03-30T21:00:06.000Z",
  "site": "https://goodoil.news",
  "tags": [
    "Read More",
    "Subscribe now"
  ],
  "textContent": "**This is edition 2026/056 of the _Ten@10_ newsletter.**\n\nHi all,\n\nThis is the Ten@10, where I collate and summarise ten news items you generally won't see in the mainstream media.\n\nEnjoy!\n\n* * *\n\n## 1. The Establishment joins the electricity insurgency\n\nBryce Edwards\n\n  * ⚡ A year ago, breaking up electricity gentailers was dismissed as “radical,” but it has rapidly become a mainstream national debate\n  * 🧠 Support is now coming from prominent establishment figures (business leaders, former politicians, executives), not fringe activists\n  * 📉 The shift highlights a widening gap between political elites and public/business sentiment on energy reform\n  * 📞 The proposal draws comparisons to the Telecom breakup, which faced similar criticism but ultimately improved outcomes\n  * 💰 Data shows gentailers paid $10.7B in dividends vs $4.5B invested—suggesting a system prioritising shareholders over infrastructure\n  * 🧩 The sector is accused of using “weaponised complexity” to stall reform and avoid scrutiny\n  * ☀️ Low solar buyback rates are criticised, with proposals for net metering to incentivise household energy generation\n  * 📄 NZ First has produced a detailed policy paper, attempting to move beyond rhetoric into implementation\n  * 📉 Broader economic context: declining GDP per capita, rising debt, and fiscal pressure heighten urgency for reform\n  * 👑 The idea is framed as politically “obvious,” yet ignored by major parties—raising questions about political inertia\n  * 🏛️ The “Stakeholder State” theory suggests power has shifted from voters to entrenched institutional interests and lobby groups\n  * 🔌 دونوں major parties (Labour and National) are accused of protecting the electricity cartel through weak or ineffective policies\n  * 💼 Business leaders like Rod Drury and Simon Bridges publicly support structural separation, signalling a major shift in elite opinion\n  * 🌍 Reform is framed not just as cost-cutting, but as a strategic opportunity for innovation, renewables, and global competitiveness\n  * 🏦 Critics argue governments enabled the problem by extracting dividends while underinvesting in generation capacity\n  * 🏢 Incumbent gentailers are seen as unlikely to disrupt themselves due to profit incentives and risk aversion\n  * 🚫 Market competition is questioned, with smaller retailers being absorbed or squeezed out by dominant players\n  * 🗳️ Multiple parties (NZ First, Greens, Labour) are now considering reforms, though political positioning and ownership of policy remain contentious\n  * 📊 Polling shows strong public and business support for breaking up gentailers, outpacing political action\n  * ⚖️ The core issue is whether politicians are willing to confront powerful corporate interests in the public interest\n  * 🔥 The debate has accelerated দ্রুত, signalling a potential turning point in New Zealand’s energy policy conversation\n\n\n\nRead More\n\n### This post is for subscribers only\n\nBecome a member to get access to all content\n\nSubscribe now",
  "title": "Your Daily Ten@10 - 2026/056",
  "updatedAt": "2026-03-30T21:00:06.361Z"
}