{
"$type": "site.standard.document",
"bskyPostRef": {
"cid": "bafyreigxkzqixaln6u4ot7ubd67koxuaszywcj5pb7dswim6nhafq42d3y",
"uri": "at://did:plc:sl2hrcwo6voaorzsr26d3bo2/app.bsky.feed.post/3mgqbbkf5xpi2"
},
"coverImage": {
"$type": "blob",
"ref": {
"$link": "bafkreigtu4teufpt4gc6hsz425nzdehlfqv3l7m4rfuiq3lijdvoolqabu"
},
"mimeType": "image/png",
"size": 1975915
},
"description": "10 News Stories They Chose Not to Tell You",
"path": "/your-daily-ten-10-2026-042/",
"publishedAt": "2026-03-10T21:00:25.000Z",
"site": "https://goodoil.news",
"tags": [
"Read More",
"Subscribe now"
],
"textContent": "**This is edition 2026/042 of the _Ten@10_ newsletter.**\n\nHi all,\n\nThis is the Ten@10, where I collate and summarise ten news items you generally won't see in the mainstream media.\n\nEnjoy!\n\n* * *\n\n## 1. How asset recycling can help solve the infrastructure deficit\n\nRoger Partridge\n\n * ⚡ The government confirmed it will spend up to **$200 million buying new shares in Genesis Energy** , officially citing energy security and stronger assets.\n * 📜 The real driver is legislation under the mixed ownership model, which forces the Crown to maintain its **51% stake** , meaning taxpayers must buy new shares whenever the company raises capital.\n * 💰 Private investors were willing to fund the share issue, but the law left ministers with two choices: **buy the shares or prevent Genesis from raising capital**.\n * 🏥 Critics argue the **$200 million could instead fund infrastructure** like hospitals or water systems rather than preserving a stake in a listed electricity company.\n * 🔌 The success of **Contact Energy** since full privatisation in 1999 is cited as evidence that electricity firms can operate successfully without government ownership.\n * 📊 The Crown’s balance sheet totals nearly **$600 billion** , including around **$24 billion in commercial enterprises** alongside essential infrastructure like roads, hospitals, and schools.\n * 🏢 These state holdings accumulated over decades without a clear strategy, spanning businesses such as **Air New Zealand** , **Kiwibank** , **New Zealand Post** , **Television New Zealand** , farms, and even the national weather service.\n * ❓ This raises a policy question: **should billions remain tied up in commercial assets or be redirected toward urgently needed infrastructure?**\n * 🧠 Treasury Secretary **Iain Rennie** has warned that New Zealand cannot grow its way out of fiscal pressure and will need **balance-sheet changes** , including capital recycling.\n * 🔁 The **The New Zealand Initiative** report _Renovating the Nation_ proposes **asset recycling** —selling non-essential government assets and reinvesting proceeds into infrastructure.\n * 🇦🇺 The model mirrors **New South Wales** , which has raised over **A$50 billion since 2012** and funded major projects like **Sydney Metro** and **WestConnex**.\n * 🏗 Successful asset recycling requires safeguards: proceeds placed in a **protected infrastructure fund** , spending that **adds to existing budgets** , and **independent project prioritisation**.\n * 🧭 New Zealand’s **New Zealand Infrastructure Commission** has identified infrastructure needs but **cannot prioritise projects** , leaving decisions vulnerable to political pressure.\n * ⚖️ Supporters argue regulation—not ownership—protects consumers, with oversight from the **Commerce Commission** ensuring fair pricing in regulated industries.\n * 📉 Critics worry about losing dividends, but proponents argue the **sale price reflects those future earnings** , while infrastructure investments generate broader long-term economic returns.\n * 🗳 With a **November election approaching** , voters may need to decide whether the government should keep commercial assets or **sell them to fund infrastructure upgrades**.\n\n\n\nRead More\n\n### This post is for subscribers only\n\nBecome a member to get access to all content\n\nSubscribe now",
"title": "Your Daily Ten@10 - 2026/042",
"updatedAt": "2026-03-10T21:00:25.332Z"
}