{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreicfggwoiy2tva2dbasfzysv3fv3a7mozwchgyc4rirquhy7ogo2l4",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:sl2hrcwo6voaorzsr26d3bo2/app.bsky.feed.post/3mehhnd75thk2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreib372zs3pgk3lrluddedifdr4hnqq4sed5upuajwemoh3kobqzuby"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 162548
  },
  "description": "“Get rid of the dry risk.”",
  "path": "/lng-plan-signals-tacit-admission-power-system-cannot-cope/",
  "publishedAt": "2026-02-09T18:58:08.000Z",
  "site": "https://goodoil.news",
  "tags": [
    "Centrist",
    "pic.twitter.com/dwxQ4Qj7KO",
    "February 9, 2026",
    "average New Zealand household",
    "**Read more over at RNZ**",
    "** _Receive our free newsletter here_**",
    "@TheRedbaiter"
  ],
  "textContent": "Summarised by Centrist\n\n**The government’s decision to fast-track a liquefied natural gas import facility in Taranaki is being positioned as an insurance policy against system failure, even as ministers avoid promising near-term price relief.**\n\nWhile ministers claim the facility could save consumers about $265 million a year, Energy Minister Simon Watts would not say whether power prices would actually be lower next winter. Instead, households and businesses will fund the project through a new levy on electricity of between $2 and $4 per megawatt hour.\n\n> Asked four times when power prices will start to fall, Energy Minister Watts ducks and dives each time.\n>\n> In the end admitting he cannot guarantee such an outcome. Even when cheaper power prices are the govt's main selling point on the new LNG plant.\n>\n> (Kudos to the girl reporter… pic.twitter.com/dwxQ4Qj7KO\n>\n> — The Redbaiter (@TheRedbaiter) February 9, 2026\n\nThe project follows months of warnings about an energy security crunch. Christopher Luxon said the country needs to “get rid of the dry risk”, acknowledging that low hydro years now pose a serious threat to supply. Mills have blamed high power prices for closures, and ministers have increasingly talked up reliability over transition goals.\n\nAn independent report by Frontier Economics warned that an LNG terminal made little economic sense if used only as emergency backup. The government has largely rejected that advice, instead signalling the terminal would evolve into a broader fuel source for industrial, commercial and residential users.\n\nMBIE modelling shows LNG imports would cap gas prices, a tacit acknowledgement that domestic gas supply is no longer reliable or competitive on its own. Officials also assessed renewable and alternative options but ruled them out due to long build times, feasibility issues and market distortions.\n\n**Editor’s note:** The average New Zealand household uses about 7,000 to 8,000 kWh of electricity per year, or roughly 0.58–0.67 MWh per month. Actual use varies by household size, region, and heating type.\n\nWith a levy of $2–$4 per MWh, this equates to about $1.15 to $2.70 per month, or roughly $14 to $32 per household per year.\n\n**Read more over at RNZ**\n\n** _Receive our free newsletter here_**",
  "title": "LNG plan signals tacit admission power system cannot cope",
  "updatedAt": "2026-02-09T18:58:08.000Z"
}