{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreiawp6gmngmwiqkvfeze2txt7velttbjlmbudik3pu2gkkljmx2soq",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:q2k4ilmlzzrnoog5dccpqwor/app.bsky.feed.post/3mk2fngevaok2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreibfogfljv4rhfdwo7er5udsb7wb3hnk7ljcjhcqcc7bzlfxfwicd4"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 6107466
  },
  "path": "/post/46244229",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-21T19:39:15.000Z",
  "site": "https://lemmy.ml",
  "tags": [
    "Open Source",
    "artifex",
    "opensource",
    "13 comments",
    "https://www.404media.co/this-ai-tool-rips-off-open-source-software-without-violating-copyright/"
  ],
  "textContent": "submitted by artifex to opensource\n84 points | 13 comments\nhttps://www.404media.co/this-ai-tool-rips-off-open-source-software-without-violating-copyright/\n\nMalus, which is a piece of “satire” but also fully functional, performs a “clean room” clone of open source software, meaning users could then sell, redistribute, etc. the software without crediting the original developers. But I have a hard time with the “clean room” argument since the LLM doing the behind-the-scenes work has already ingested the entire corpus of open source software – and somehow the output of the LLMs isn’t considered a derivative work.",
  "title": "This AI Tool Rips Off Open Source Software Without Violating Copyright"
}