{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreibexoyyj4pepnrlnljwwrotizvenglbf4rxayhytewthz5qjh657m",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:q2k4ilmlzzrnoog5dccpqwor/app.bsky.feed.post/3mekah4d64ml2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreiafjivhlwwamtsljdkeprs4jnmjqtjfwujbzahe7u7tnhu3wzpvae"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/png",
    "size": 468691
  },
  "path": "/post/42902315",
  "publishedAt": "2026-02-09T06:09:46.000Z",
  "site": "https://lemmy.ml",
  "tags": [
    "Open Source",
    "Maragato",
    "opensource",
    "87 comments",
    "https://www.privacyguides.org/en/real-time-communication/",
    "privacyguides.org/…/real-time-communication.webp"
  ],
  "textContent": "submitted by Maragato to opensource\n115 points | 87 comments\nhttps://www.privacyguides.org/en/real-time-communication/\n\nHello. I am looking for an alternative to Telegram and I prefer an application that uses decentralised servers. My question is: why is the xmpp+omemo protocol not recommended on websites when it is open source and decentralised? The privacyguides.org website does not list xmpp+omemo as a recommended messaging service. Nor does this website include it in its comparison of private messaging services.\n\nprivacyguides.org/…/real-time-communication.webp\n\nWhy do you think xmpp and its messaging clients such as Conversations, Movim, Gajim, etc. do not appear in these guides?",
  "title": "Best apps for private messaging"
}