{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreid75vkncpm2z5g547ozbykvsvsjazkd2bk7v3npc7xxcw4mc3lkyu",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:pmmp7irwts7faw56jdxk3idc/app.bsky.feed.post/3mnx6cl34jxy2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreicsi7g3thwv52wjhzx64u2vyffql3uyjbgqnsecvntwe5vy5op6ga"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 674693
  },
  "path": "/news/2026-06-biological-aging-clocks-insights-diagnostics.html",
  "publishedAt": "2026-06-10T12:20:06.000Z",
  "site": "https://medicalxpress.com",
  "textContent": "The Journal of Medical Internet Research released a feature story on the accuracy and utility of consumer wearables that estimate so-called biological age in its News and Perspectives section. In \"Sorting Science From Marketing in the Era of Data-Driven Biological Aging Clocks,\" JMIR Correspondent Jenna Congdon breaks down the gimmick—how biosensor-enabled devices use proxy data to approximate age, the differences between consumer models and research-grade clinical clocks, and how users can best interpret these metrics.",
  "title": "Biological aging clocks offer insights, not diagnostics"
}