{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreigxjj4chluwpr56b3ir7j45t7sgjkowne4nninwim5m5yowyxlmwq",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:pi6woz4d47bkuws673w2il2r/app.bsky.feed.post/3mm2qcl2s4ih2"
  },
  "path": "/t/anti-llm-sentiment-considered-harmful/14008?page=7#post_126",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-17T14:38:15.000Z",
  "site": "https://discourse.haskell.org",
  "tags": [
    "Rust development of their LLM policy",
    "variou",
    "related posts"
  ],
  "textContent": "exaexa:\n\n> On a happier side note about related news, I recommend looking at Rust development of their LLM policy (essentially a very softly elaborated ban, which is nice to see), and especially some of the related slashback on the avoidance of discussion of ethical concerns. A very unfortunately-worded disturbing trigger statement is now edited out of the PR, but perhaps it will be visible in history or in various related posts [content warning for F words].\n\nYikes, that discussion looks like quite the prickly bush. I can imagine it must be very difficult to discuss a topic like that where so many people have such strong, and such opposing views.\n\nI’m willing to bet that there cannot exist a policy on something this controversial without at least some people calling the authors names over it (e.g. “coward”). I suppose that’s just what you have to deal with if you’re in a leading role of such a big project. Some hard decisions will need to be made that will make a lot of people extremely unhappy. Both on the policy itself as well as the discussion about the policy.\n\nLooking at the policy itself, it seems like they tried to put a lot of nuance in. It is neither a full ban not a full toleration of LLM use.",
  "title": "Anti-LLM Sentiment Considered Harmful"
}