{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreiaqat6tity7ofksukyvlxtbzsxujrj2i3sogibromicmpcts4pvay",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:pi6woz4d47bkuws673w2il2r/app.bsky.feed.post/3mm2gcj3r52t2"
  },
  "path": "/t/anti-llm-sentiment-considered-harmful/14008?page=7#post_125",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-17T11:34:16.000Z",
  "site": "https://discourse.haskell.org",
  "tags": [
    "Rust development of their LLM policy",
    "variou",
    "related posts"
  ],
  "textContent": "> To bring the conversation back on topic, most of the pushback here seems to be coming from people who haven’t used coding agents seriously and are mostly repeating common tropes about LLMs.\n\nDo my “deep concerns about ethics and sustainability” count as “common tropes”?\n\nDo I need to invest time into doing something that I consider deeply unethical and completely wasteful so that my concerns are taken seriously? Should I start collecting rigorous statistics on how many LLM PRs I had to prove to be garbage?\n\n* * *\n\nOn a happier side note about related news, I recommend looking at Rust development of their LLM policy (essentially a very softly elaborated ban, which is nice to see), and especially some of the related slashback on the avoidance of discussion of ethical concerns. A very unfortunately-worded disturbing trigger statement is now edited out of the PR, but perhaps it will be visible in history or in various related posts [content warning for F words].",
  "title": "Anti-LLM Sentiment Considered Harmful"
}