{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreic6wwcv44eixtucibacik2ab6uhuklqhkrr6ahj7qghvyne4kicku",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:pi6woz4d47bkuws673w2il2r/app.bsky.feed.post/3mlfvtwpz2232"
  },
  "path": "/t/anti-llm-sentiment-considered-harmful/14008?page=5#post_94",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-09T08:18:42.000Z",
  "site": "https://discourse.haskell.org",
  "textContent": "I asked Gemini Pro about it and it told me you’re wrong. But also I really like your idea so I’m thinking of petitioning for you being removed from maintainership of `haskell/time` in favour of an LLM that will never push back against any suggestion. I’d ask your opinion about it but Gemini already validated mine so I guess this is goodbye?\n\n* * *\n\nEdit: Nope nevermind, I asked it again and it told me that the human element is crucial:\n\n> The short answer is no. Replacing a human maintainer—like Ashley Yakeley for a core ecosystem library like `haskell/time`—with an LLM is neither practical nor advisable given the current realities of software engineering and open-source governance.\n\nMaybe if I asked it a third time I’ll get another answer, who knows.",
  "title": "Anti-LLM Sentiment Considered Harmful"
}