{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreiftc4vgndeijnwrkuivyztrtrwtegruoschxvu7qixvbnf7vvz2bq",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:pi6woz4d47bkuws673w2il2r/app.bsky.feed.post/3ml6ycoueguf2"
  },
  "path": "/t/anti-llm-sentiment-considered-harmful/14008?page=4#post_71",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-06T15:03:41.000Z",
  "site": "https://discourse.haskell.org",
  "textContent": "If the code is “average”, architecturally weaker and increases technical (and cognitive) debt… then it seems the only advantage is that you can deliver faster.\n\nThen I’m curious why you would chose to do so in your open source projects, where you have less delivery pressure.\n\nIs it that you care more about the end product than the process of coding?\n\nI’ve head that theory recently, that the most avid LLM adopters are maybe those that in fact don’t care about coding on its own, but more as a means to an end. I have no idea how accurate that theory is, so I’m curious to hear your thoughts. I’ve also heard about people who claim it actually reinvigorated their excitement for coding (I’m guessing because they can potentially delegate all the stuff they don’t find interesting to the agents).",
  "title": "Anti-LLM Sentiment Considered Harmful"
}