{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreianofgvl7yjy47gw6swgkmourxh26rcduffnbyiryztcb5oe2p5xi",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:pi6woz4d47bkuws673w2il2r/app.bsky.feed.post/3mkvo3gf5aid2"
  },
  "path": "/t/anti-llm-sentiment-considered-harmful/14008?page=3#post_59",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-02T20:21:00.000Z",
  "site": "https://discourse.haskell.org",
  "textContent": "I’m probably in the Anti-LLM club here, but in fact I don’t really feel a problem with the LLMs (whoever wants to fill gaps using probabilistic methods and it works for them, please do!)\n\nI’m frankly more anti-industry-adoption-as-the-only-measure-of-success, somewhat anti-burning-of-planet-by-datacenters, and also kindof anti-reliance-on-proprietary-gigablob-of-weights. Perhaps even, I thought the higher-level PLs are here so that I can easily structure the understanding and control of what computers do, instead of having to maintain the code heaps like in the old times or hire helpers (even electronic ones!) – perhaps for the sake of good engineering? No big deal with anything that would be really LLM-specific.",
  "title": "Anti-LLM Sentiment Considered Harmful"
}