{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreihlcaicuad7jfqyum2a64jmabbfhauqo6ihbvsetam3rbazhchpni",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:pi6woz4d47bkuws673w2il2r/app.bsky.feed.post/3mksq5ws7alm2"
  },
  "path": "/t/anti-llm-sentiment-considered-harmful/14008?page=2#post_33",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-01T16:52:56.000Z",
  "site": "https://discourse.haskell.org",
  "tags": [
    "@hasufell"
  ],
  "textContent": "shinzui:\n\n> I’m concerned that developers who use coding agents to contribute to the ecosystem may be discouraged from participating.\n\nI read any “anti AI” policy as “anti sloppy work” policy for the simple reason that if you’re a project maintainer you really can’t tell if someone wrote code using an LLM or their bare hands unless they added the LLM as a co-author.\n\nIf you:\n\n  * Use a library\n  * Find a bug\n  * Implement a bugfix _and_ understand that bugfix (with or without an LLM)\n  * Submit a PR under your own name and take responsibility for what you’ve done\n\n\n\nThen I find it extremely unlikely it would get rejected or labeled slop or that you would even raise any suspicion.\n\nIn the cases where you can obviously tell a PR is vibe-coded, chances are you’ve run into some very sloppy work that’s not worth the effort of even understanding (maybe that’s not the case, but who would waste their time). That’s what I understand @hasufell is talking about.",
  "title": "Anti-LLM Sentiment Considered Harmful"
}