{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreicb7c3mdpwqvyd7kbxzelglzeiodh7woc4sadqf4zwb2qrydwu3o4",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:pi6woz4d47bkuws673w2il2r/app.bsky.feed.post/3mknv7cmv6us2"
  },
  "path": "/t/why-microhs-uses-combinators/13992#post_8",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-29T18:28:16.000Z",
  "site": "https://discourse.haskell.org",
  "textContent": "Theoretically there are bad cases, but they don’t happen in practice. The bad case is deeply nested lambdas, but that’s not common.\n\nJust the optimization you get from using B and C is enough to make sizes reasonable.",
  "title": "Why microhs uses combinators?"
}