{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreigajlxmo2i34wgml7g2azs6qc6lvu5odq6liptnlvfywaykgydl2a",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:pi6woz4d47bkuws673w2il2r/app.bsky.feed.post/3mjjg35msfws2"
  },
  "path": "/t/why-we-built-a-haskell-package-manager-in-rust/13933#post_6",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-15T07:44:23.000Z",
  "site": "https://discourse.haskell.org",
  "tags": [
    "hx",
    "bhc",
    "outright slop",
    "a whole bunch of longstanding Haskell concerns"
  ],
  "textContent": "simonmic:\n\n> Maybe we can have a bit more substantive discussion over here\n\nBoth the supposed alternatives for Cabal and GHC (hx, bhc) were LLM-generated by a single user over the course of several months by pushing straight to `main` with failing Github Actions tests. bhc’s API documentation is outright slop yanked from GHC and it claims it has addressed a whole bunch of longstanding Haskell concerns with no issues opened, no pull requests and presumably zero active users.\n\nThis has about as much to do with Haskell as pasture mud has to do with human food. Reposting these kinds of articles should be a bannable offense.\n\n* * *\n\nOh, also there’s a “try it” `curl` at the end of the article that could well be a malicious link.",
  "title": "Why We Built a Haskell Package Manager in Rust"
}