{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreib47zzndukvi7luuink6ockrysr2ko3toof2junxxh7kdm6nnm3wa",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:pi6woz4d47bkuws673w2il2r/app.bsky.feed.post/3mj4uu5yo4mj2"
  },
  "path": "/t/type-level-programming-is-still-programming/13890#post_6",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-08T23:12:40.000Z",
  "site": "https://discourse.haskell.org",
  "textContent": "always a pleasure to read one of your articles, i always learn something … if Haskell truly is a ‘impractical academic obsession’ than at least it’s a great ‘impractical academic obsession’ and i can still love it the way i love anything else (it’s my favorite child actually)\n\nsome day perhaps we’ll see type-level thinking become the norm, even if there’s a couple hiccups like a O(2^n) `If` class ; typed dataframes prove how cool and useful it can be!",
  "title": "Type-level programming is still programming"
}