{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreifdekmx27i7fwcwvfx3w3ttpnmqmafwhv3ukhoftc5mndicxsrnbi",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:pi6woz4d47bkuws673w2il2r/app.bsky.feed.post/3mifmmokjehv2"
  },
  "path": "/t/why-not-use-smallcheck/13860#post_11",
  "publishedAt": "2026-03-31T19:15:20.000Z",
  "site": "https://discourse.haskell.org",
  "textContent": "Bodigrim:\n\n> Guess what? I’ve never seen a case where it would spot a bug, which QuickCheck didn’t.\n\nNot surprising; that’s really not where the value of exhaustive—or rather, _simplest first_ —testing lies. IMO the big win is getting a genuinely minimal counterexample to your property in cases where greedy shrinking just isn’t good enough.",
  "title": "Why not use smallcheck?"
}