{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreiecgvopgumfa2a7dwiet53ngiw5yoypdqlsammevmxajyawqamjyy",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:pi6woz4d47bkuws673w2il2r/app.bsky.feed.post/3mh4ptzln7572"
  },
  "path": "/t/yet-another-opinion-on-llms-hasufells-blog/13775?page=2#post_33",
  "publishedAt": "2026-03-15T15:46:19.000Z",
  "site": "https://discourse.haskell.org",
  "tags": [
    "The Chinese Room Argument (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)"
  ],
  "textContent": "reuben:\n\n> do we really have a clear enough characterization of what reasoning is to be able to say that LLMs are not doing it?\n\nThis sort of thing has been studied quite a bit in philosophy. This article is a good starting point if you are interested: The Chinese Room Argument (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)",
  "title": "Yet another opinion on LLMs · Hasufell's blog"
}