{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreiepjci2vysydhlq6g3e7xa2uqbxwic5lpcb5lpiuvfp6pcjiwacey",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:pi6woz4d47bkuws673w2il2r/app.bsky.feed.post/3mh4j4cvjydk2"
  },
  "path": "/t/yet-another-opinion-on-llms-hasufells-blog/13775?page=2#post_37",
  "publishedAt": "2026-03-15T16:29:30.000Z",
  "site": "https://discourse.haskell.org",
  "tags": [
    "Dijkstra has covered this topic comprehensively."
  ],
  "textContent": "reuben:\n\n> I personally don’t think it’s a good idea to avoid anthropomorphic language. It’s useful (not just for whimsical purposes) to say things like “Claude thought I meant “linear” in the sense of linear algebra, but I actually meant it in the sense of linear logic, let me clarify that. I would say that having beliefs and reasoning is (sometimes) a good effective description of what a complicated computer system is doing.\n\nThat’s a good example of precisely what I try to avoid. But Dijkstra has covered this topic comprehensively. I don’t need to reiterate it.",
  "title": "Yet another opinion on LLMs · Hasufell's blog"
}