Yet another opinion on LLMs · Hasufell's blog

idk I have unlimited usage at work so I just use Opus and it immediately hallucinates [1] if I have it generate more than like a function. Which isn’t useless - it’s a husk I can fill with value. Saves me some typing of the general boilerplate and imports. Not a bad use of like 50c.

Also if I do keep it small, the functions it generates are pretty bad? So much case splitting - I would ask a junior to improve it before merge. Instead with Claude, I improve it and have Claude tell me how and why my Haskell is better than its suggestion. Opus is good at that!

inb4 the general follow-ups of all the stuff I now have to do to get this thing to maybe be as useful as my bare hands and brain in emacs and ghci lolol