{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreibs5t5d76ckhtz727n7kq5ezekxekaatrfuylt5uiforxe2otrzs4",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:pi6woz4d47bkuws673w2il2r/app.bsky.feed.post/3mguorrld2q52"
  },
  "path": "/t/yet-another-opinion-on-llms-hasufells-blog/13775#post_10",
  "publishedAt": "2026-03-12T11:39:20.000Z",
  "site": "https://discourse.haskell.org",
  "textContent": "I developed _some_ abstractions for the glue code I mentioned but it still needed a fair bit of boilerplate. The main takeaway is probably feasibility of writing tests. I find it usually a huge pain, it’s an incredible amount of boilerplate that makes my brain melt, and one can largely offload it to a supervised LLM. It all depends on a project I guess. One project of mine I would not really let LLM touch it I guess maybe apart from small refactors. But things like tests or servers are perfect fit.",
  "title": "Yet another opinion on LLMs · Hasufell's blog"
}