Fork `basement`? As `baseplate`?

Each functioning state has ways to overrule the rights of an individual when the welfare of the society is at stake. E.g. if I owned a large forest in the middle of Germany and the state wanted to build new powerlines from North to South and needed them go through my forest, I could resist to sell, but eventually courts would rule that I have to give up parts of my property that the state needs. I find it ridiculous that we allow an individual to “own” a name on Hackage for the sole purpose of depriving the community of its use or to pickle a deceased package so that their great works can be admired undefiled for all eternity by posteriority. A package that has 100s or 1000s of dependents isn’t someones toy project anymore, but a vital resource of the community, and if the author has abandoned it I see no reason why the community should not be allowed to maintain it for the common good. We are missing a court that decides on such cases, though, and I don’t think there could be a simple rule. Difficult takeovers need to be decided on a case to case basis, balancing the rights of the individual with the needs of the community. And the judges need to be appointed in a transparent way.