{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreicdgfx243cwuqdbeetlukktya2mvy36cboxvuvw2k4sl6qj4l6nqi",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:pgryn3ephfd2xgft23qokfzt/app.bsky.feed.post/3mpqtmxxyacd2"
  },
  "path": "/t/can-llm-agents-develop-precognition/177347#post_7",
  "publishedAt": "2026-07-03T14:23:03.000Z",
  "site": "https://discuss.huggingface.co",
  "textContent": "Hi Mason, You wil find many tests on performance for different cognitive workflows in the repo. Although you do get an increased latency as you are replacing an LLM call by many, the price is worthy for a lot of cases, particularly those with critical actions at the end. The preflight is a good example of a cognitive process that can be treated as portable and easily programmable with cognitive layer with its COGITs validated. Thats why i am using it, but there are many more examples where you need/want to have explicit control over the thinking process and cannot work with a black box and go ¨trust me bro, I am thinking¨. You need explicit control and that is what a cognitive layer provides.",
  "title": "Can LLM Agents Develop Precognition?"
}