{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreihdvxlavsix2bczhfj72gs5iz6s7jktpub4fpk33xlpquh3mkhk4u",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:pgryn3ephfd2xgft23qokfzt/app.bsky.feed.post/3mplf34oqvqt2"
  },
  "path": "/t/cannot-restart-my-private-space-503-something-went-wrong-when-restarting-this-space/177235#post_6",
  "publishedAt": "2026-07-01T10:31:25.000Z",
  "site": "https://discuss.huggingface.co",
  "tags": [
    "https://huggingface.co/api/spaces/Ark-kun/tangent-1/runtime",
    "(click for more details)"
  ],
  "textContent": "Nice. But, Oh, Uh, please look at this URL: https://huggingface.co/api/spaces/Ark-kun/tangent-1/runtime. Since it says `Flagged as abusive`, that means the Space has been deliberately paused by Hugging Face-side systems, not just accidentally broken by the app. So I think repeatedly creating similar duplicates is risky. Details:\n\n* * *\n\n## The important part is the runtime API, not the 503 page\n\nThe restart dialog shows a generic 503, but the runtime API gives the more specific state:\n\n\n    {\n      \"stage\": \"PAUSED\",\n      \"hardware\": {\n        \"current\": null,\n        \"requested\": \"cpu-upgrade\"\n      },\n      \"gcTimeout\": 300,\n      \"errorMessage\": \"Flagged as abusive\",\n      \"replicas\": {\n        \"requested\": 1\n      },\n      \"devMode\": false,\n      \"domains\": [\n        {\n          \"domain\": \"ark-kun-tangent-1.hf.space\",\n          \"stage\": \"READY\"\n        }\n      ]\n    }\n\n\nSo I would treat this as:\n\n\n    Space state: PAUSED\n    Runtime message: Flagged as abusive\n    Likely owner of the next action: Hugging Face-side review\n\n\nnot as:\n\n\n    normal Python crash\n    normal Docker build failure\n    normal app_port mismatch\n    normal hardware allocation problem\n\n\nThis does **not** prove malicious intent. It also does **not** tell us which file, dependency, route, command, or behavior triggered the flag. But it does mean that normal rebuild/debug actions are probably not the main path anymore.\n\n## Practical decision tree\n\nObservation | Meaning | Practical next step\n---|---|---\nRuntime API says `stage: PAUSED` and `errorMessage: Flagged as abusive` | The Space is in a HF-side flagged/paused state | Ask HF to review/unpause; include the runtime API output\nUI restart/factory rebuild returns 503 | Expected symptom once the Space is held in a paused/flagged state | Do not treat the 503 itself as the root cause\nHardware change does not help | Consistent with a flag/state issue rather than resource shortage | Stop switching hardware as the main fix\nA similar duplicate also becomes paused quickly | The code/pattern/account state may be re-triggering the flag | Avoid repeated full duplication\nBuild/container logs update and show real errors | Then it may still have app-level issues too | Debug those only after the flagged state is resolved\nRuntime API does **not** show abuse wording in some other case | Then use the normal build/container/healthcheck decision tree | Debug logs, port, startup timeout, etc.\n\nFor this specific Space, the first row is the key one.\n\n## Recommended next move\n\nI would reply to the HF support email thread, or send a new concise request to `website@huggingface.co`, with the runtime API output included.\n\nUse the runtime API output as the main evidence. Something like:\n\n\n    Subject: Space stuck in PAUSED state - runtime API says \"Flagged as abusive\"\n\n    Hi Hugging Face team,\n\n    My Space appears to be stuck in a Hugging Face-side flagged PAUSED state.\n\n    Space:\n    https://huggingface.co/spaces/Ark-kun/tangent-1\n\n    Runtime API:\n    https://huggingface.co/api/spaces/Ark-kun/tangent-1/runtime\n\n    The runtime API currently shows:\n\n    stage: PAUSED\n    hardware.current: null\n    hardware.requested: cpu-upgrade\n    errorMessage: Flagged as abusive\n    domain: ark-kun-tangent-1.hf.space\n    domain stage: READY\n\n    The UI restart/factory rebuild actions return 503. Switching hardware and creating a similar Space did not resolve the issue.\n\n    If this was triggered by an automated scanner or abuse handler, I believe it may need manual review. The intended purpose of the Space is:\n\n    ...\n\n    It is not intended to provide proxy, tunnel, relay, scraping, spam, remote-browser, or restriction-bypass functionality.\n\n    If any part of the implementation is not acceptable on Spaces, please let me know what needs to be removed or changed.\n\n    Could you please review whether this is a false positive and, if appropriate, clear or unpause the Space?\n\n    Thanks.\n\n\nThe key sentence is:\n\n\n    The runtime API says: \"errorMessage\": \"Flagged as abusive\".\n\n\nThat is much more actionable than only saying “restart gives 503”.\n\nWhy I would avoid repeated duplication now (click for more details) Why this repo may look sensitive to an automated scanner (click for more details) What we can conclude vs. what we still cannot conclude (click for more details) Relevant public precedents (click for more details) Normal Docker/App debugging is secondary here (click for more details) If the goal is a browser-based coding/development environment (click for more details)\n\n## Final recommendation\n\nAt this point, I would treat the case as:\n\n\n    confirmed flagged Space state\n    not confirmed malicious abuse\n    not confirmed exact trigger\n    HF-side review required\n\n\nSo the immediate path is:\n\n\n    1. Send the runtime API output to HF.\n    2. Explain the legitimate intended use.\n    3. Avoid repeated full duplicates.\n    4. Ask what must be removed or changed.\n    5. Only resume app-level debugging after the flagged PAUSED state is resolved.\n\n\nIf it is a false positive, HF needs to clear it. If it is not a false positive, HF is the only party that can tell you what boundary was crossed.",
  "title": "Cannot restart my private space: \"503. Something went wrong when restarting this Space.\""
}