{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreicbv3bu3drdkwtwveizz2gi4j7bcf35s4wdk3iqwupwfgwnf3mi44",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:pgryn3ephfd2xgft23qokfzt/app.bsky.feed.post/3moqbhupbg5b2"
  },
  "path": "/t/engineering-emergence-from-prompting-to-a-new-topological-discipline/176921#post_15",
  "publishedAt": "2026-06-20T15:03:42.000Z",
  "site": "https://discuss.huggingface.co",
  "textContent": "Thank you, this makes a lot of sense.\n\nI think we are looking at different layers of a potentially compatible architecture.\n\nMy current work with PCE is primarily focused on the behavioral regulation side: how a model navigates uncertainty, contradictory constraints, adversarial pressure, and competing interpretations within an open solution space.\n\nYour DESi framework appears to address a different but equally important problem: how to maintain persistent, auditable, replayable epistemic state outside the model itself.\n\nI find that distinction increasingly useful, and I suspect the two approaches may ultimately be more complementary than competing.\n\nI’ll take a closer look at DESi. Thank you for sharing it and for helping clarify the architectural boundary between behavioral regulation and epistemic governance.\n\nBest regard,\n\nAllan",
  "title": "Engineering Emergence: From Prompting to a New Topological Discipline?"
}